Activities‎ > ‎talks_calendar‎ > ‎

mSIDE model: a nonlinear model for deindividuation effects

Brief Presentation:

The phenomenon of deindividuation is certainly complex, also in light of the fact that there are many variables considered critical in determining it. The present research has focused on the modeling of the multidimensional phenomenon of deindividuation, taking into consideration the variables of anonymity, the salience of social identity, physical isolation and the type of environment (i.e., real or virtual). Moreover, in consideration of the tests encountered, the research shows the presence of personality variables that can influence the adhesion of the subjects to the group norms, depending on the type of environment in which the test took place.


Sketch Presentation:

mSIDE ‎(Sara)‎


  • Cinnirella, M., & Green, B. (2007). Does ‘cyber-conformity’vary cross-culturally? Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior23(4), 2011-2025.

  • Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology47(2S), 382.

  • Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of personality and social psychology78(4), 708

  • Huang, G., & Li, K. (2016). The effect of anonymity on conformity to group norms in online contexts: A meta-analysis. International journal of communication10, 18.

  • Hughes, M., & Louw, J. (2013). Playing games: The salience of social cues and group norms in eliciting aggressive behaviour. South African Journal of Psychology, 43(2), 252-262.

  • Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of the SIDE model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 28–45.

  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(10), 1243-1254.

  • Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43(3), 503.

  • Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European review of social psychology6(1), 161-198.

  • Spears, R. (1995). Isolating the collective self. In The self in European and North American culture: Development and processes (pp. 309-322). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology29(2), 121-134.

  • Tisserand, J. C. (2014). Ultimatum game: A meta-analysis of the past three decades of experimental research. In Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (No. 0802032). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

  • Vilanova, F., Beria, F. M., Costa, Â. B., & Koller, S. H. (2017). Deindividuation: From Le Bon to the social identity model of deindividuation effects. Cogent Psychology4(1), 1308104.

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska press.

Comments