Activities‎ > ‎talks_calendar‎ > ‎

Online Social Identity Salience

Brief Presentation
Social Identity is an interesting but complex concept to be defined.
In the past it was studied by the most important social psychologists,
but what are the most recent findings about this theme? And in
particular, what are the most recent findings about social identity
salience phenomena in CMC environments? The answers are not satisfied
at all; online social identity salience has to be still studied a lot
to be known. Recent studies focalize on the social network contexts or
on the MMOGs but they don't give a strong contribution to significant

Sketch presentation

Online social identity salience


  • Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Gamon, M., Dumais, S., (2011). Mark my words!:linguistic style accommodation in social media. In: Proceedings ofthe 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 745–754.
  • Guegan, J., Moliner, P., & Buisine, S. (2015). Why are online games so self‐involving: A social identity analysis of massively multiplayer online role‐playing games. European Journal of Social Psychology45(3), 349-355.
  • Guegan, J., Segonds, F., Barré, J., Maranzana, N., Mantelet, F., & Buisine, S. (2017). Social identity cues to improve creativity and identification in face-to-face and virtual groups. Computers in Human Behavior77, 140-147.
  • O'Connor, E. L., Longman, H., White, K. M., & Obst, P. L. (2015). Sense of community, social identity and social support among players of massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs): A qualitative analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology25(6), 459-473.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689–715. 
  • Scott, C.R., (2007). Communication and social identity theory: existing and potentialconnections in organizational identification research. Commun. Stud. 58 (2),123–138.
  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social”in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30–65). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  • Stendal, K., & Fuller, R. (2017). The Effect of Virtual Team Membership Change on Social Identity Development: A Case from Higher Education in Norway. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Suler, J. R. (2002). Identity management in cyberspace. Journal of applied psychoanalytic studies4(4), 455-459.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relation. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. 
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations,  Worchel S., Austin W. (eds.)  Nelson Hall: Chicago; 7 – 24.
  • Tamburrini, N., Cinnirella, M., Jansen, V. A., & Bryden, J. (2015). Twitter users change word usage according to conversation-partner social identity. Social Networks40, 84-89.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Vernuccio, M., Pagani, M., Barbarossa, C., & Pastore, A. (2015). Antecedents of brand love in online network-based communities. A social identity perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management24(7), 706-719.