Activities‎ > ‎talks_calendar‎ > ‎

The Affinity system

Brief Presentation

Affinity is a computer-based assessment of sexual interest that it combines self-report measures with an unobtrusive viewing time (VT) validity scale. The purpose of this system is to enable an easy assessment of sexual interest in individuals of different ages and verify or deny the authenticity of the preference profile by an unobtrusive measure. This work aims to describe the Affinity system and to highlight its property, simplicity and potential. 

Sketch presentation

The affinity system


  • Glasgow, D. V., Osborne, A., & Croxen, J. (2003). An assessment tool for investigating paedophile sexual interest using viewing time: An application of single case methodology. British Journal of Learning Disabilities31(2), 96-102.


  • Glasgow, D. V. (2009). Affinity: The development of a self-report assessment of paedophile sexual interest incorporating a viewing time validity measure. Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders, 59-84.


  • Worling, J. R. (2006). Assessing sexual arousal with adolescent males who have offended sexually: Self-report and unobtrusively measured viewing time. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment18(4), 383-400.

  • Bruno, N. (2015). Elementi di Psicofisica.

  • Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time effects revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted task conditions. Archives of sexual behavior39(6), 1275-1288. 

  • Mokros, A., Gebhard, M., Heinz, V., Marschall, R. W., Nitschke, J., Glasgow, D. V., ... & Laws, D. R. (2013). Computerized assessment of pedophilic sexual interest through self-report and viewing time: Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the Affinity program. Sexual Abuse25(3), 230-258.

  • Jiang, Y., Costello, P., Fang, F., Huang, M., & He, S. (2006). A gender-and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences103(45), 17048-17052. 
  • Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research37(1), 8-23. 

  • Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2004). Conscious processing of sexual information: Mechanisms of appraisal. Archives of Sexual Behavior33(4), 369-380.

  •  Sanders, G. S., & Baron, R. S. (1975). The motivating effects of distraction on task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32(6), 956.


  • Geer, J. H., & Melton, J. S. (1997). Sexual content-induced delay with double-entendre words. Archives of Sexual Behavior26(3), 295-316.